Rating site most accurate?

Topic

Lets be honest, ratings matter to some more than others and there are players who outplay their ranking and of course are busts. But what site is most accurate?

There are major disagreements in terms of rating with 3 Husky commits. Moore who is a 4 star on Rivals vs high 3 on 247. Not rated on espn. Voi Tunuufi who is rated as a 4 star on espn but 3 star on 247 and rivals, and Kuao Peihopa who rivals rates as a 4 star but he is a 3 elsewhere.

To me, these three guys have a shot at making it into legit 4 star territory if high school football plays this year. But that is just me.

Worst disagreement I have seen is Jordan Chin who is a 4 star on espn but a low 3 star on other sites.

Replies

I think the only widely accepted agreement is that ESPN’s ratings blow, particularly for players on the west coast.

247 COMPOSITE is likely to be the most accurate just based on crowd sourcing principle but if I had to choose just one it would be the 247 standard one. I would say if 247 just took out ESPN from their composite it would be the more accurate though…

All the rankings are absolute dog shit and they will continue to be dog shit until these morons hire former college coach’s to scout these kids and do the rankings for them. I can rank these kids better myself than these retards can. Most of them never even played football.

I only go by the DDY rating system and even then only when it says a player is not going to see the field and they start at guard their true freshman season or become an all American under Bob Gregory their senior year.

I go by Ballz ratings who has every player UW signing turning into a future NFL all-pro.